IP IntelligenceIP Lex ›Book a service

IP IntelligenceFor YouSpinning a company out of university research

For students

Spinning a company out of university research

We want to commercialise the lab work. What has to happen to the IP?

IntermediateStudentResearcherUniversityFounder
Short answer

The rights have to move from the individuals and the institution into the company, in writing and recorded - and that is usually the slowest part of the whole process.

The chain that has to exist

Inventors → institution (under the IP policy, or by assignment) → company (by assignment or exclusive licence). Every link in writing, and assignments recorded with the Patent Office.

Where the research was funded, the funding terms sit on top of all of it and may impose licence-backs, working obligations or approval requirements. Read them before agreeing anything with investors.

An exclusive licence from the institution is common and workable, but investors will look closely at its term, its field, its termination rights and whether the company can enforce the patent itself.

What to sort before the first term sheet

Which patents and applications are in scope, by number. Who the named inventors are and whether the naming is correct. Whether any of the work has already been published, and when. Whether any foreign filing has happened where an India-resident inventor was involved - section 39 applies to them personally.

And what happens to future improvements made in the lab after the spin-out. That is the clause that causes the most friction two years later.

What to actually do

  • Map the full chain from inventors to company, in writing.
  • Read the funding terms before agreeing anything with investors.
  • Check whether the enforcement right sits with the company or the institution.
  • Agree now who owns post-spin-out improvements.

Sources & further reading

Related

Not sure whether this applies to your invention?

The honest answer usually needs someone to look at your actual disclosure, your timeline and the prior art. That is a conversation, not an article.

Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.

Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.