IP Intelligence › Red Flags › Before a funding round or an acquisition
Red flag checklist
Before a funding round or an acquisition
Run this before the data room opens, not after the first question.
IP diligence rarely finds bad patents. It finds missing paperwork - and that is what delays closings and re-prices rounds.
Tick anything that is true. Each tick opens a short note on why it matters. Nothing you tick is sent anywhere - it stays in this browser tab.
- If yes: List every inventor against every case. Every blank is a task, and it gets harder once people have left.
- If yes: Fix the templates, and get confirmatory assignments for past work.
- If yes: Get a written assignment covering the pre-incorporation period specifically.
- If yes: Record them. It is administrative and cheap compared with explaining why it was not done.
- If yes: Use patent pending or patent applied for until grant, everywhere - deck, website, packaging.
- If yes: Have at least a scoped view, with the assumptions written down.
- If yes: Run the post-grant housekeeping checklist first.
- If yes: Document it, restrict access, and decide whether it should have been a filing.
Almost every item here costs a few hours if done early and a re-priced round if done late.
Sources & further reading
- The Patents Act, 1970 (consolidated to 1 August 2024) — Official IP India text
Related
Nobody wrote down who owns it
An invention belongs to its inventors unless something in writing moves it. Filing in the company's name does not by itself transfer anything. Ownership defects are …
Assignment
A transfer of ownership of a patent or an application from one person to another. In India it must be in writing, and it has to be recorded in the register to be eff…
What investors actually check about your IP
Chain of title, accuracy of what you have claimed publicly, freedom to operate, and whether anything critical exists only in someone's head.
The consultant who still owned it
Who owns the invention, and who should have been named?
Not sure whether this applies to your invention?
The honest answer usually needs someone to look at your actual disclosure, your timeline and the prior art. That is a conversation, not an article.
Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.
Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.
