IP Intelligence › For You › Getting founder IP into the company
For founders
Getting founder IP into the company
I invented it before the company existed. Does the company own it?
Not automatically. Pre-incorporation inventions belong to the individuals until a written assignment moves them, and that assignment has to be specific and recorded.
Why this is the most common diligence failure
The sequence is almost universal: the founder invents, the company is incorporated later, and everybody assumes the two are the same thing. They are not. The invention belongs to the natural person who devised it, and Indian law requires assignments of patent rights to be in writing.
When counsel asks for the assignment from each named inventor in a data room, the absence is easy to spot and awkward to explain.
What a clean position looks like
A written assignment from each founder, executed with correct legal names, expressly covering the pre-incorporation period as well as work after it. Employment agreements containing a present assignment of inventions rather than a promise to assign. Equivalent clauses for consultants, contractors and interns. And every assignment recorded with the Patent Office.
It costs an afternoon at the start. It costs a re-priced round if left to the end.
What to actually do
- Execute assignments covering the pre-incorporation period specifically.
- Use present assignments, not promises to assign.
- Record every assignment with the Patent Office.
- Do this before the data room opens.
Sources & further reading
- The Patents Act, 1970 (consolidated to 1 August 2024) — Official IP India text
Related
Nobody wrote down who owns it
An invention belongs to its inventors unless something in writing moves it. Filing in the company's name does not by itself transfer anything. Ownership defects are …
Before a funding round or an acquisition
IP diligence rarely finds bad patents. It finds missing paperwork - and that is what delays closings and re-prices rounds.
The consultant who still owned it
Who owns the invention, and who should have been named?
Not sure whether this applies to your invention?
The honest answer usually needs someone to look at your actual disclosure, your timeline and the prior art. That is a conversation, not an article.
Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.
Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.
