Sign inOpen the app
IP Lex · Indian IP case law

IP Case Law › Trade Marks › S. Syed Mohideen v. P. Sulochana Bai

Trade Marks Ragulika IP case note

S. Syed Mohideen v. P. Sulochana Bai

CourtSupreme Court of India
BenchHon'ble Justice H.L. Dattu and Hon'ble Justice A.K. Sikri
Case numberCivil Appeal No. 2758 of 2015
Citation(2016) 2 SCC 683
Judgment date17 March 2015
IP categoryTrade Marks
PartiesS. Syed Mohideen (Appellant) v. P. Sulochana Bai (Respondent)

Relevant Acts and provisions

Trade Marks Act, 1999

Section 27(2)Section 28(3)Section 34

Provisions considered: Sections 27(2), 28(3) and 34 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, on passing off and prior user rights.

Brief facts

The respondent's family had run a halwa business in Tirunelveli under a distinctive trading name for around a century and held a registered trade mark for it. The appellant began selling halwa under a deceptively similar trade name and had also obtained his own trade mark registration. The respondent sued for a declaration, permanent injunction and other reliefs, alleging passing off and infringement.

Free to read once you are signed in

Read the rest of this case note

The findings, the decision and the principle the court settled on are below. Create a free account to keep reading. No payment, and nothing to cancel.

Already have an account? Sign in

Keywords

Deceptive Similarity Goodwill Passing Off Prior User Registered Trade Mark

Read the judgment

View judgment (court website)