IP Case Law › Trade Marks › Acqua Minerals Limited v. Pramod Borse & Anr.
Relevant Acts and provisions
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958
Provisions considered: Common law passing off and cybersquatting, read with Section 27(2) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.
Brief facts
Acqua Minerals Limited, the registered proprietor of a well-known trade mark for packaged drinking water with a substantial share of the Indian bottled water market, discovered that the defendants had registered the identical name as a domain name without any authorisation or business connection with the plaintiff.
Free to read once you are signed in
Read the rest of this case note
The findings, the decision and the principle the court settled on are below. Create a free account to keep reading. No payment, and nothing to cancel.
Already have an account? Sign in
We use your details to give you access and to contact you about your enquiry. See our privacy policy.
Keywords
Bad Faith Adoption Cybersquatting Domain Names Passing Off Well-known Trade Mark
Read the judgment
More Trade Marks judgments
ADS Spirits Pvt. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks
Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 proscribes registration only where a mark is devoid of distinctive character, that is, incapable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of another; it does not…
Absolute Grounds for RefusalArbitrary MarkDistinctivenessNon-speaking OrderTrade MarksAmazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Direct Selling Guidelines, 2016, being advisory executive instructions without the force of law, cannot bind e-commerce platforms. Once goods bearing a registered trade mark have been put on the market with the proprietor's co…
E-commerceExhaustion Of RightsIntermediary LiabilityOnline InfringementTrade MarksAmrit Singh Mehta trading as Mehta Cosmetics v. Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks
Where a trade mark is registered after its normal renewal date, the proprietor is entitled to a six-month period from the actual date of registration to seek renewal. Further, a trade mark cannot be removed for non-renewal without…
Form O-2Form O-3Registration CertificateRemoval of Trademark