IP Case Law › Designs › Diageo Brands B.V. & Anr. v. Alcobrew Distilleries India Pvt…
Relevant Acts and provisions
Designs Act, 2000
Provisions considered: Section 22(1) of the Designs Act, 2000, on the test for design infringement and functional features.
Brief facts
Diageo, owner of a registered design for a distinctively shaped whisky bottle, sued Alcobrew alleging that a rival bottle infringed the registered design and was an obvious or fraudulent imitation under Section 22.
Free to read once you are signed in
Read the rest of this case note
The findings, the decision and the principle the court settled on are below. Create a free account to keep reading. No payment, and nothing to cancel.
Already have an account? Sign in
We use your details to give you access and to contact you about your enquiry. See our privacy policy.
Keywords
Design Infringement Functionality Novelty Scope Of Design Protection Trade Dress
Read the judgment
More Designs judgments
Designs
Bharat Glass Tube Limited v. Gopal Glass Works Limited
A design's novelty and originality under the Designs Act must be assessed by comparing it, as applied to the specific article for which registration is sought, against prior art shown to have been applied to the same or a similar …
CancellationDesign RegistrationNoveltyOriginalityDesignsCarlsberg Breweries A/S v. Som Distilleries and Breweries Ltd.
A single suit combining a cause of action for infringement of a registered design with a cause of action for passing off is maintainable under Order II Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 where both claims flow from the sa…
Composite SuitCopyright Design OverlapDesign InfringementPassing OffDesignsCrocs Inc USA v. M/s Bata India Ltd and Ors.
In commercial litigation, costs ordinarily follow the outcome of the case, and the successful party is awarded actual and reasonable litigation expenses. Parties pursuing commercial disputes must bear the financial consequences of…
Actual CostsCancellation of DesignDesign InfringementIndustrial Design