IP Case Law › Designs › Crocs Inc USA v. M/s Bata India Ltd and Ors.
Relevant Acts and provisions
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Designs Act, 2000
Provisions considered: Section 2(g) of the Designs Act, 2000; Sections 35 and 35A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Brief facts
Crocs Inc. USA filed a suit against Bata India Ltd. alleging infringement of its registered footwear Design No. 197685 and sought an injunction and damages. An ex-parte interim injunction was initially granted and Local Commissioners were appointed, who seized allegedly infringing products from the Defendants' premises.
Free to read once you are signed in
Read the rest of this case note
The findings, the decision and the principle the court settled on are below. Create a free account to keep reading. No payment, and nothing to cancel.
Already have an account? Sign in
We use your details to give you access and to contact you about your enquiry. See our privacy policy.
Keywords
Actual Costs Cancellation of Design Design Infringement Industrial Design Litigation Costs Novelty Prior Publication
Read the judgment
More Designs judgments
Bharat Glass Tube Limited v. Gopal Glass Works Limited
A design's novelty and originality under the Designs Act must be assessed by comparing it, as applied to the specific article for which registration is sought, against prior art shown to have been applied to the same or a similar …
CancellationDesign RegistrationNoveltyOriginalityDesignsCarlsberg Breweries A/S v. Som Distilleries and Breweries Ltd.
A single suit combining a cause of action for infringement of a registered design with a cause of action for passing off is maintainable under Order II Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 where both claims flow from the sa…
Composite SuitCopyright Design OverlapDesign InfringementPassing OffDesignsDiageo Brands B.V. & Anr. v. Alcobrew Distilleries India Pvt. Ltd.
The test for infringement of a registered design under Section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000 is whether the design, viewed by an instructed or knowledgeable observer aware of the prior art, is identical or an obvious or fraudulent i…
Design InfringementFunctionalityNoveltyScope Of Design Protection