IP Case Law › Trade Marks › Amrit Singh Mehta trading as Mehta Cosmetics v. Controller G…
Relevant Acts and provisions
Trade Marks Act, 1999
Trade Marks Rules, 2002
Provisions considered: Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999; Rule 64(3) of the Trade Marks Rules, 2002; Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Brief facts
The mark BLUE CHIPS was registered under Class 3 on 3 August 2005, on an application filed by the Petitioner on 21 July 1992. The Petitioner claimed that he did not receive the registration certificate and hence was unaware that renewal was required. The trade mark was removed from the register due to non-renewal and treated as expired.
Free to read once you are signed in
Read the rest of this case note
The findings, the decision and the principle the court settled on are below. Create a free account to keep reading. No payment, and nothing to cancel.
Already have an account? Sign in
We use your details to give you access and to contact you about your enquiry. See our privacy policy.
Keywords
Form O-2 Form O-3 Registration Certificate Removal of Trademark Renewal Restoration of Trademark Section 25(3) Writ Petition
Read the judgment
More Trade Marks judgments
Trade Marks
Acqua Minerals Limited v. Pramod Borse & Anr.
Registration of a domain name identical or deceptively similar to another's well-known trade mark, by a person having no legitimate connection with that mark and who seeks to profit from its transfer, amounts to bad faith cybersqu…
Bad Faith AdoptionCybersquattingDomain NamesPassing OffTrade MarksADS Spirits Pvt. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks
Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 proscribes registration only where a mark is devoid of distinctive character, that is, incapable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of another; it does not…
Absolute Grounds for RefusalArbitrary MarkDistinctivenessNon-speaking OrderTrade MarksAmazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Direct Selling Guidelines, 2016, being advisory executive instructions without the force of law, cannot bind e-commerce platforms. Once goods bearing a registered trade mark have been put on the market with the proprietor's co…
E-commerceExhaustion Of RightsIntermediary LiabilityOnline Infringement