Case LawActs & SectionsIP IntelligenceOpen the app
IP Lex · Indian IP case law

Search Indian IP Case Law

Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.

Clear filters

7 results

for “Distinctiveness”

Trade Marks

ADS Spirits Pvt. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks

Delhi High Court · C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 8/2026 and I.A. 3697/2026

Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 proscribes registration only where a mark is devoid of distinctive character, that is, incapable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of another; it does not…

Absolute Grounds for RefusalArbitrary MarkDistinctivenessNon-speaking Order
Trade Marks

Daimler Benz Aktiegesellschaft & Anr. v. Hybo Hindustan

Delhi High Court · AIR 1994 Delhi 239

A trade mark that has attained an extraordinary worldwide reputation is entitled to protection against use on entirely unrelated goods, since such unauthorised use dilutes and demeans the distinctiveness of the mark; delay or hone…

Delay And AcquiescenceDilutionPassing OffTrademark Infringement
Trade Marks

Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. v. Girnar Food & Beverages (P) Ltd.

Supreme Court of India · (2004) 5 SCC 257

A trade mark that is otherwise descriptive or laudatory of the goods is not, for that reason alone, incapable of protection in a passing off action; if the mark has, through long and extensive use, acquired a secondary meaning ide…

Descriptive MarksDistinctivenessGeneric MarksPassing Off
Trade Marks

Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma v. Navaratna Pharmaceutical Laboratories

Supreme Court of India · AIR 1965 SC 980

An action for infringement of a registered trade mark is a statutory remedy in which the use of a deceptively similar mark is itself actionable regardless of get-up, packaging or intent to deceive, whereas an action for passing of…

Acquired DistinctivenessDeceptive SimilarityDescriptive MarksInfringement
Trade Marks

Marico Limited v. Agro Tech Foods Limited

Delhi High Court · 2010 (44) PTC 736 (Del)

A trade mark consisting of ordinary descriptive words remains vulnerable to a competitor's bona fide descriptive use under Sections 30(2)(a) and 35 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, notwithstanding registration; such a mark attains pr…

Descriptive MarksDistinctivenessGeneric MarksPassing Off
Trade Marks

New Balance Athletics Inc. v. Astormueller AG and Ors.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 962/2025

Registration of a mark is no defence to a passing off action, since rights under Section 27(2) are independent of and override the bar in Section 28(3) on one registered proprietor suing another for infringement. Registration mere…

Anti-Dissection RuleDeceptive SimilarityInitial Interest ConfusionPassing Off
Other

Tabassum Jamal Hashmi v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 812/2026

An individual's personality rights, encompassing name, image, voice, likeness and other distinctive attributes, are protectable by injunction against unauthorised commercial exploitation, and this protection extends to misuse effe…

AI And DeepfakesDynamic InjunctionIntermediary LiabilityPersonality Rights