Open the app
IP Lex · Indian IP case law

Search Indian IP Case Law

Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.

118Judgments indexed
15Acts & Rules linked
5Courts covered
6IP categories

Recently added judgments

Case notes prepared by the Ragulika IP team, each linked to the judgment on the court’s website.

Patents

T-Mobile International AG and Co. KG. v. The Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks and Anr.

Delhi High Court · C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 149/2022

Section 3(m) contains four disjunctive exceptions: a mere scheme, rule, or method of performing a mental act, and a method of playing a game. The word 'mere' qualifies the first three limbs, confining the exclusion to claims that …

Computer Implemented InventionGuidelinesMental ActMethod of Playing Game
Other

Tabassum Jamal Hashmi v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 812/2026

An individual's personality rights, encompassing name, image, voice, likeness and other distinctive attributes, are protectable by injunction against unauthorised commercial exploitation, and this protection extends to misuse effe…

AI And DeepfakesDynamic InjunctionIntermediary LiabilityPersonality Rights
Patents

Tapas Chatterjee v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs & Anr.

Delhi High Court · LPA 836/2023

A rejection for lack of inventive step under Section 2(1)(ja) must be supported by a structured, reasoned analysis identifying the skilled person, the inventive concept, and the specific differences from the cited prior art and wh…

Inventive StepKnown ProcessObviousnessPatent Prosecution
Trade Marks

Tata Sons Ltd. v. Greenpeace International & Anr.

Delhi High Court · (2011) 45 PTC 275 (Del)

Use of a registered trade mark in a non-commercial context, for the purpose of parody, satire or criticism of the proprietor's conduct, does not amount to infringement or dilution under Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, …

Comparative AdvertisingDilutionFreedom Of SpeechParody
Geographical Indications

Tea Board, India v. ITC Limited

Calcutta High Court · 2019 SCC OnLine Cal 1085

A certification trade mark or geographical indication registered for a good protects only that good and does not, without more, extend to use of the certified word for unrelated services; an infringement action under the Geographi…

Certification Trade MarkDilutionGeographical IndicationLimitation
Patents

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) v. Intex Technologies (India) Ltd.

Delhi High Court · 2023:DHC:2243-DB

In disputes over standard essential patents, an implementer who negotiates without genuine intent to license while continuing to exploit the patented standard is an unwilling licensee, and courts may order interim security, includ…

FRANDInterim InjunctionPatent InfringementStandard Essential Patent
Copyright

The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford & Ors. v. Rameshwari Photocopy Services & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6229

The exception under Section 52(1)(i) of the Copyright Act, 1957 for reproduction in the course of instruction is a substantive, purpose-based exception furthering access to education and is not confined by rigid quantitative fair-…

Access To EducationCopyright InfringementEducational ExceptionFair Dealing
Copyright

Tips Industries Ltd. v. Wynk Music Ltd. & Anr.

Bombay High Court · 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 13037

The statutory licence for broadcasting under Section 31D of the Copyright Act, 1957 is confined to conventional, non-interactive radio and television broadcasting and does not extend to internet-based streaming or download service…

Assignment And LicensingBroadcasting RightsDigital PlatformsMusic And Sound Recordings
Other

Titan Industries Ltd. v. M/s Ramkumar Jewellers

Delhi High Court · 2012 SCC OnLine Del 2382

A celebrity possesses an enforceable right of publicity in the commercial value of his or her identity, which may be validly licensed to an endorsing company; infringement of that right does not require proof of falsity, confusion…

Copyright InfringementFalse EndorsementPassing OffPersonality Rights
Trade Marks

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. Prius Auto Industries Ltd. & Ors.

Supreme Court of India · (2018) 2 SCC 1

The law of passing off in India is governed by the territoriality doctrine, under which a plaintiff must prove actual goodwill and reputation for its mark among a substantial section of purchasers within the Indian market at the r…

GoodwillPassing OffPrior UserTransborder Reputation
PreviousPage 11 of 12Next