Search Indian IP Case Law
Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.
14 results
for “copyright infringement”
ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC
An Indian court has jurisdiction if the plaintiff's principal place of business is in India, or if the defendant targets Indian users, even when the defendant's servers are located abroad. Even temporarily storing a copyrighted wo…
Artificial IntelligenceCopyright Fair DealingCopyright InfringementJurisdictionCopyrightDAZN Limited & Anr. v. Back.methstreamer.com & Ors.
Websites that are substantially and primarily dedicated to unauthorised communication to the public of exclusively licensed broadcasts may be restrained by a permanent, whole-site injunction under Section 37 of the Copyright Act, …
Broadcasting RightsCopyright InfringementDigital PlatformsDynamic InjunctionCopyrightEastern Book Company & Ors. v. D.B. Modak & Anr.
Copyright in a derivative or compiled work requires the exercise of some minimum degree of creativity through the application of skill and judgment, and not merely labour and capital expended in copying. Inputs that involve only m…
Copyright InfringementLiterary WorkOriginalityPublic DomainCopyrightKrishika Lulla & Ors. v. Shyam Vithalrao Devkatta & Anr.
The title of a literary, dramatic or cinematographic work, being ordinarily a short combination of common words, is not by itself a work in which copyright can subsist under Section 13(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957, since it la…
Copyright InfringementIdea-Expression DichotomyLiterary WorkOriginalityCopyrightMRF Limited v. Metro Tyres Limited
Copyright in a cinematograph film under Section 13(1)(b) of the Copyright Act, 1957 is not defeated by the absence of the kind of originality required for literary or artistic works, and infringement under Section 14(d) is establi…
Cinematograph FilmComparative AdvertisingCopyright InfringementOriginalityCopyrightMy Space Inc. v. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd.
An internet intermediary hosting user-generated content is not liable for copyright infringement merely because its business model derives revenue from such content or because it performs format-shifting or indexing; it forfeits t…
Copyright InfringementDigital PlatformsIntermediary LiabilityOnline InfringementCopyrightOpella Healthcare Group v. Pureca Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Copyright)
A defendant cannot defend a copyright infringement suit on the basis of a registration that has been cancelled by an unchallenged rectification order which found the artistic work to be a copy of the plaintiff's pre-existing get-u…
Artistic WorkColourable ImitationCopyright RectificationLabel DesignCopyrightR.G. Anand v. M/s Delux Films & Ors.
Copyright protects only the particular form of expression of an idea, theme, subject matter or plot, and never the idea itself. Substantial similarity of theme between two works is not infringement if the treatment, incidents and …
Copyright InfringementDramatic WorkIdea-Expression DichotomyOriginalityCopyrightSanjay Soya Pvt. Ltd. v. Narayani Trading Company
Copyright registration under the Copyright Act, 1957 is not mandatory to institute or maintain a suit for infringement; copyright subsists automatically in an original work upon its creation, and Sections 44, 45 and 48 merely crea…
Artistic WorkCopyright InfringementCopyright RegistrationEvidentiary PresumptionCopyrightThe Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford & Ors. v. Rameshwari Photocopy Services & Ors.
The exception under Section 52(1)(i) of the Copyright Act, 1957 for reproduction in the course of instruction is a substantive, purpose-based exception furthering access to education and is not confined by rigid quantitative fair-…
Access To EducationCopyright InfringementEducational ExceptionFair Dealing