IP IntelligenceIP Lex ›Book a service

IP IntelligenceReal ScenariosThe lab that published before the TTO heard about it

Real-life scenario · fictionalised

The lab that published before the TTO heard about it

CriticalBefore filingBeginnerResearcherUniversityStudent
What happened

A research group submits a paper describing a new purification method in January. It is accepted in April and appears online as an accepted manuscript in May. The group mentions the commercial potential to the technology transfer office in June. The TTO files a provisional in July.

Is anything salvageable?

The May date is the problem

An accepted manuscript posted online is available to the public. That is the priority-relevant date, not the print issue months later. The July filing is after it.

Section 31(d) covers a paper read by the true and first inventor before a learned society, or published with consent in that society's transactions, with twelve months running from the reading or publication. A journal is not automatically a learned society and an online accepted manuscript is not automatically its transactions - this limb is narrow and should not be assumed.

What can still be done

Two things are worth checking carefully. First, what the paper actually enabled: papers routinely omit process parameters, scale-up conditions and the specific ranges that make a method work in practice. Undisclosed subject matter can still support claims.

Second, jurisdiction. Several countries have grace periods that would still permit filing. The decision then becomes commercial: is protection outside India worth the cost, given India is lost?

What should have happened

  • Operated a rule that no manuscript is submitted without an IP check - a one-page form and a week.
  • Filed a provisional at submission, using the manuscript itself as the basis.
  • Treated acceptance and online-first posting as the publication date, not the print issue.
  • Trained the group on this once a year - it is a five-minute conversation that prevents the whole problem.
The one-line lesson

For a research group, the IP decision belongs at manuscript submission, not at publication.

This scenario is a composite teaching example written by Ragulika IP. It does not describe any real client, application or matter, and any resemblance to a specific case is coincidental.

Related

Thinking about filing?

Before anything is drafted, the useful work is establishing what is already public, what is genuinely yours, and what you can honestly claim.

Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.

Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.