IP IntelligenceIP Lex ›Book a service

IP IntelligenceFor YouPresenting at a conference before you file

For students

Presenting at a conference before you file

Is a conference presentation a disclosure?

BeginnerStudentResearcher
Short answer

Almost always yes. The narrow learned-society limb of section 31 does not cover ordinary academic or industry conferences, and posters, abstracts and slides are all publications.

Where the exception actually sits

Section 31(d) covers a paper read by the true and first inventor before a learned society, or published with his consent in the transactions of such a society, with twelve months running from the reading or publication.

That is specific. A conference organised by a commercial body, a workshop, an industry summit, a poster session, an online talk - none of these can be assumed to fall inside it. Nor can the conference proceedings, unless they are the transactions of a learned society.

And the exhibition limb requires the exhibition to have been extended to section 31 by a Central Government notification. Most trade fairs have not been.

The practical sequence

File first, present second. A properly written provisional takes days, not months, and the twelve months that follow are exactly the period you would have spent preparing the paper anyway.

If the abstract deadline has already passed and the abstract itself discloses the invention, that abstract is the date to work from - not the presentation.

What to actually do

  • Treat abstracts and posters as publications with their own dates.
  • Do not assume section 31 covers your conference.
  • File before the abstract deadline where possible.
  • Keep the submitted version and its date.

Related

Thinking about filing?

Before anything is drafted, the useful work is establishing what is already public, what is genuinely yours, and what you can honestly claim.

Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.

Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.