IP IntelligenceIP Lex ›Book a service

IP Intelligence

Patent Criticalities

The things that quietly decide whether an invention can be protected - explained before they cost you anything.

Showing 23 of 56.

Critical

You told the world before you told the Patent Office

In India there is no general grace period. If your invention was made available to the public before your priority date, that disclosure is prior art against your ow…

Before filingBeginner
High

The prior art nobody checked

Prior art is anything already available to the public, anywhere in the world, in any language, in any form. A team can be genuinely original and still be second - an…

Before filingBeginner
Critical

Nobody wrote down who owns it

An invention belongs to its inventors unless something in writing moves it. Filing in the company's name does not by itself transfer anything. Ownership defects are …

Before filingIntermediate
Critical

A granted patent does not mean you are free to sell

A patent is a right to stop other people. It is not a licence to practise your own invention. Your product can be simultaneously protected by your patent and blocked…

After grantBeginner
Critical

Claim 1 describes your product instead of your invention

Claim 1 is the patent. If it recites the specific product you happened to build - your materials, your dimensions, your architecture - then a competitor only has to …

During draftingIntermediate
Critical

Nobody asked the Patent Office to look at it

An Indian patent application is not examined unless someone files a request and pays for it. If the request is not filed in time, the application is treated as withd…

During examinationIntermediate
Critical

The reply that quietly gave the patent away

A first examination report is an opening position, not a rejection. The two ways applicants lose value here are missing the date, and buying a grant by conceding mor…

During examinationIntermediate
High

New is the easy part. Inventive is the hard part.

Novelty is a single-document test and it is largely mechanical. Inventive step is a judgement about whether a competent, unimaginative person in your field would hav…

During examinationIntermediate
High

Software claimed as software

You cannot patent a computer programme per se. You can, on current Indian authority, patent an invention that happens to be implemented in software if it delivers a …

During draftingAdvanced
High

Adding words does not make a claim stronger

It feels safer to describe the invention thoroughly in the claim. It is the opposite of safer. Every additional word is an additional condition that a competitor has…

During draftingIntermediate
High

There is nowhere to retreat to

Claim 1 will often not survive examination. What decides whether you still have a patent worth having is whether the drafter built a ladder of narrower, meaningful p…

During draftingIntermediate
High

Nobody decided what the priority date was for

Priority is not a property of your application. It attaches, claim by claim, to whatever was fairly disclosed in the filing you are relying on. Treating it as a sing…

Before filingAdvanced
Critical

Filing abroad first, without permission

A person resident in India may not apply outside India for a patent without written permission from the Controller, unless an application for the same invention was …

Before filingAdvanced
Critical

The twelve months that decide your international position

Twelve months from your first filing, you must either file in each country you care about, or file a PCT application that preserves the option. There is no third cho…

Before filingIntermediate
Critical

Most applications do not fail. They stop.

Very few Indian applications are refused after an argument. Most simply end because a date passed - and because there is no decision to appeal, there is often nothin…

During examinationBeginner
Critical

The patent died of neglect

Renewal fees are due from the expiration of the second year from the date of the patent, and each year after. Miss them and the patent ceases to have effect - usuall…

After grantBeginner
Critical

The working statement nobody filed

India requires patentees and licensees to tell the Patent Office whether a patent has been worked in India. The obligation moved from annual to once every three fina…

After grantIntermediate
High

A granted patent can still be taken away

Grant is a decision by an examining office on the material in front of it. Section 13(4) says expressly that it carries no warranty of validity - and there are four …

After grantBeginner
High

Somebody is reading your published application

Publication makes your application visible to everyone who competes with you. In some industries, opposition is a routine part of the landscape rather than an except…

During examinationAdvanced
High

Nobody enforces your patent for you

Granting a patent and enforcing it are done by completely different institutions. The Patent Office has no role once a patent is granted - enforcement is a civil act…

After grantBeginner
High

The patent that only covers what you already sell

There is a version of every application that will be granted: the one narrowed to precisely what you already sell. It is also the version competitors do not need to …

During examinationIntermediate
Medium

The licence that could not be enforced

Most licence disputes are not about royalty rates. They are about who may do what, where, and what happens when something changes - and those are the clauses that ge…

After grantIntermediate
High

The invention changed after you filed

A patent application protects what it described on the day it was filed. Engineering does not stop on that day - and the version you eventually sell is often meaning…

During draftingIntermediate

LowWorth knowing
MediumCould create complications
HighCan materially affect protection
CriticalAct before proceeding

This is the Ragulika IP Educational Criticality - our own editorial prioritisation device, to help you decide what to read first. It is not a legal score, it is not calculated from your facts, and it says nothing about the strength of any particular application.

Keep going.

Every explanation here links to the ones next to it. Follow the thread rather than the menu.

Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.