IP Intelligence › Red Flags › Before signing a research collaboration
Red flag checklist
Before signing a research collaboration
Run this before the agreement is signed, not before the first paper.
Collaboration agreements decide ownership, publication and control years before anyone knows what will be invented.
Tick anything that is true. Each tick opens a short note on why it matters. Nothing you tick is sent anywhere - it stays in this browser tab.
- If yes: Prefer a clear allocation with a licence back over undefined joint ownership.
- If yes: Thirty to sixty days notice with a right to request a short delay for filing is the usual compromise.
- If yes: Name the decision-maker and the payer for each category of invention.
- If yes: Build the check into the agreement so it is not left to whoever instructs foreign counsel.
- If yes: List background IP in a schedule at signature, while it is easy.
- If yes: Read the funding terms alongside the collaboration agreement, not separately.
- If yes: Agree in advance that inventorship will be determined from the technical record.
- If yes: Address exit, including assignment options and continuing licences.
The cheapest moment to allocate ownership is before anyone knows what the invention will be worth.
Sources & further reading
- The Patents Act, 1970 (consolidated to 1 August 2024) — Official IP India text
Related
Nobody wrote down who owns it
An invention belongs to its inventors unless something in writing moves it. Filing in the company's name does not by itself transfer anything. Ownership defects are …
Who owns an invention made at a university?
Whatever the institutional IP policy, the employment or enrolment terms, and the funding agreement say together - read all three, because the answer is rarely in one…
IP in sponsored and collaborative research
Who owns background, who owns foreground, who may publish and when, who may file and who pays, and what happens when the project ends.
Not sure whether this applies to your invention?
The honest answer usually needs someone to look at your actual disclosure, your timeline and the prior art. That is a conversation, not an article.
Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.
Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.
