Case LawActs & SectionsOpen the app
IP Intelligence

Search Indian IP Case Law

Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.

23Judgments indexed
9Acts & Rules linked
2Courts covered
4IP categories

Recently added judgments

Case notes prepared by the Ragulika IP team, each linked to the judgment on the court’s website.

Trade Marks

Havells India Limited & Anr. v. Havai Home Products Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 778/2024 (with I.A. 38970/2024)

Even a registered proprietor may be restrained from using a trade mark where the ingredients of passing off are established. Section 27(2) preserves the common-law remedy of passing off notwithstanding the statutory rights arising…

Anti-Dissection RuleDeceptive SimilarityDishonest AdoptionPassing Off
Trade Marks

Industria De Diseno Textil, S.A. v. Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.

Delhi High Court · C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 52/2024, I.A. 33885/2024

Section 11(2) does not require an earlier mark to have a formal declaration of well-known status before its owner can oppose a later mark; the provision only requires that the mark is well known. The term 'entitled' in Explanation…

Anti-Dissection RuleBad FaithDeceptive SimilarityPhonetic Similarity
Patents

Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. v. The Controller of Patents

Delhi High Court · C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 24/2023

Although the deuterated compound demonstrated approximately 72% higher parent-drug exposure in the blood, the comparative studies showed substantially similar pharmacological activity between the deuterated and non-deuterated comp…

Deuterated CompoundsHeterocycle-fused Gamma-carbolinesParent Drug ExposurePharmacological Activity
Trade Marks

New Balance Athletics Inc. v. Astormueller AG and Ors.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 962/2025

Registration of a mark is no defence to a passing off action, since rights under Section 27(2) are independent of and override the bar in Section 28(3) on one registered proprietor suing another for infringement. Registration mere…

Anti-Dissection RuleDeceptive SimilarityInitial Interest ConfusionPassing Off
Copyright

Opella Healthcare Group v. Pureca Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Copyright)

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 552/2024 & I.A. 32616/2024 (arising from I.A. 4622/2025)

A defendant cannot defend a copyright infringement suit on the basis of a registration that has been cancelled by an unchallenged rectification order which found the artistic work to be a copy of the plaintiff's pre-existing get-u…

Artistic WorkColourable ImitationCopyright RectificationLabel Design
Trade Marks

Opella Healthcare Group v. Pureca Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Trade Marks)

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 552/2024 & I.A. 32616/2024 (arising out of I.A. 4622/2025)

Where a coordinate bench, following an unchallenged rectification order, has found the mark in question deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered mark, the defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the infri…

Deceptive SimilarityPassing OffPharmaceutical MarksPrior Use
Trade Marks

Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.

Delhi High Court · LPA 316/2026 & CM APPL. 27819-20/2026

Where two parties file competing applications for registration of an identical or deceptively similar trade mark on a proposed-to-be-used basis, priority for registration under Section 18 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is determined…

Approbation and ReprobationPrior RegistrationPriorityProposed to be Used
Copyright

Preity G. Zinta v. Google LLC & Ors.

Bombay High Court · Interim Application (L) No. 20703 of 2026 in Commercial IP Suit No. 245 of 2026

When someone uses AI to create deepfakes or morphed content that distorts or alters how a performer's actual performance looks or sounds, without her consent, this violates her moral rights under Section 38-B of the Copyright Act.…

AI DeepfakesIntermediary LiabilityMoral Rights of PerformersPersonality Rights
Copyright

Saregama India Ltd. v. Black Madras Films & Ors.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 1310/2025 & CS(COMM) 143/2026

Copyright in a musical composition is distinct from copyright in the sound recording and cinematograph film in which the composition is incorporated. The composer, as author of the musical work, retains copyright in the musical co…

Assignment of RightsCinematograph FilmComposerLiterary and Musical Works
Patents

Sulzer Mixpac AG v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs

Delhi High Court · LPA 545/2024

Adjudication under the Patents Act has to be guided by the statute rather than by a mechanical, step-by-step application of judicial formulas. A patent decision cannot be overturned or deemed invalid solely because it did not stri…

Common Bar ElementInstallation BodyInventive StepObviousness
PreviousPage 2 of 3Next