IP Case Law › Copyright › Ritika Private Limited v. Biba Apparels Private Limited
Relevant Acts and provisions
Copyright Act, 1957
Provisions considered: Section 15(2), Copyright Act, 1957; Designs Act, 2000
Brief facts
Ritika, a fashion label, sued Biba for copying its garment designs, claiming copyright in drawings and designs. The designs had not been registered under the Designs Act and had been industrially applied to garments.
Free to read once you are signed in
Read the rest of this case note
The findings, the decision and the principle the court settled on are below. Create a free account to keep reading. No payment, and nothing to cancel.
Already have an account? Sign in
We use your details to give you access and to contact you about your enquiry. See our privacy policy.
Keywords
Copyright and Design Overlap Fashion Designs Garments Industrial Reproduction Section 15(2)
Read the judgment
More Copyright judgments
Copyright
Amar Nath Sehgal v. Union of India & Anr.
The special or moral rights of an author under Section 57 of the Copyright Act, 1957 are independent of the economic rights of copyright and survive assignment of the work; they protect the author's personality, honour and reputat…
Artistic WorkAssignment And LicensingCultural HeritageIntegrity RightCopyrightANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC
An Indian court has jurisdiction if the plaintiff's principal place of business is in India, or if the defendant targets Indian users, even when the defendant's servers are located abroad. Even temporarily storing a copyrighted wo…
Artificial IntelligenceCopyright Fair DealingCopyright InfringementJurisdictionCopyrightAzure Hospitality Private Limited v. Phonographic Performance Limited
Pending trial, a user of sound recordings may be permitted to continue use on paying the copyright owner at the tariff of a registered copyright society, instead of being injuncted, where the owner is not itself a registered copyr…
Copyright SocietyInterim Injunction ModifiedPublic PerformanceRMPL