IP Case Law › Patents › InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors. v. Xiaomi Corpora…
Relevant Acts and provisions
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Provisions considered: Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in a suit for infringement of standard essential patents.
Brief facts
InterDigital sued Xiaomi in Delhi for infringing Indian patents essential to mobile telecommunications standards after licensing talks failed. Xiaomi responded by obtaining an anti-suit injunction from a Chinese court restraining InterDigital from pursuing or enforcing any injunction against Xiaomi anywhere in the world, including India, on pain of a daily penalty.
Free to read once you are signed in
Read the rest of this case note
The findings, the decision and the principle the court settled on are below. Create a free account to keep reading. No payment, and nothing to cancel.
Already have an account? Sign in
We use your details to give you access and to contact you about your enquiry. See our privacy policy.
Cases cited
- Modi Entertainment Network v. W.S.G. Cricket Pte. Ltd., (2003) 4 SCC 341
Authorities referred to in the decision. Please verify each citation in the judgment itself.
Keywords
Anti-Anti-Suit Injunction Comity Of Courts Cross-Border Litigation FRAND Standard Essential Patent
Read the judgment
More Patents judgments
Patents
Array Biopharma Inc v. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs
A combination of distinct and independent active drugs, each with its own chemical identity and mechanism, does not fall under the Section 3(d) bar for derivatives of known substances. Using phrases such as 'for simultaneous, sepa…
Inventive StepMethod of TreatmentPharmaceutical CombinationPrior ArtPatentsBayer Corporation v. Union of India & Ors.
A compulsory licence under Section 84 of the Patents Act, 1970 may be granted where the reasonable requirements of the public with respect to a patented invention have not been satisfied, the invention is not available at a reason…
Compulsory LicencePublic HealthReasonably Affordable PriceSection 84PatentsBigtec Private Limited v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
An objection that devising nucleotide probes or primers is routine experimentation lacking inventive step under Section 2(1)(ja) must engage with evidence of unexpected effects placed on record; and the Section 3(c) exclusion for …
BiotechnologyInventive StepPatent ProsecutionPrior Art