IP Case Law › Patents › Canva Pty Ltd & Ors. v. RxPrism Health Systems Private Limit…
Relevant Acts and provisions
Provisions considered: Patents Act, 1970 (infringement; interim injunction)
Brief facts
RxPrism alleged that Canva's 'Present and Record' feature, which lets users create presentations with a video overlay and interactive elements, infringed its patent IN360726 for a system and method for creating and sharing interactive content. A Single Judge granted interim relief, and Canva appealed.
Issues before the Court
Whether the Single Judge's interim injunction should be set aside.
Court's findings
Having examined the Single Judge's reasoning, the Division Bench found no merit in the appeal; observations were confined to the prima facie stage (paras 198-200).
Decision
Appeal dismissed; no costs.
Key legal principle / ratio
An appellate court will not disturb a reasoned interim injunction in a patent infringement suit concerning a software-implemented feature where the Single Judge's prima facie view is sustainable.
Important paragraph references
Paras 198-201.
Important: This case note is a research summary only. It must be verified against the full judgment by a qualified lawyer, advocate or patent/trade mark attorney before any reliance. Do not rely on it as legal advice; Ragulika IP accepts no responsibility for its accuracy or for any action taken on it.
Keywords
Appeal Dismissed Interactive Content Interim Injunction Software-related Patent Video Overlay
Read the judgment
More Patents judgments
Agriboard International LLC v. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs
An order refusing a patent for lack of inventive step must contain a reasoned analysis of the prior art and of why the claimed invention would be obvious; an unreasoned order will be set aside and remanded.
Inventive StepPatent OfficePrior Art AnalysisReasoned OrderPatentsArray Biopharma Inc v. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs
A combination of distinct and independent active drugs, each with its own chemical identity and mechanism, does not fall under the Section 3(d) bar for derivatives of known substances. Using phrases such as 'for simultaneous, sepa…
Inventive StepMethod of TreatmentPharmaceutical CombinationPrior ArtPatentsAstraZeneca AB & Anr. v. Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited
A patentee that has treated a later patent as coextensive in term with an earlier patent covering the same compound abroad cannot, at the interim stage, claim a longer period of protection for the later patent in India; interim re…
DapagliflozinEvergreeningGenus PatentInterim Injunction