Sign inOpen the app
IP Lex · Indian IP case law

IP Case Law › Other › Anil Kapoor v. Simply Life India & Ors.

Other Ragulika IP case note

Anil Kapoor v. Simply Life India & Ors.

CourtDelhi High Court
BenchHon'ble Justice Prathiba M. Singh
Case numberCS(COMM) 652/2023
Citation2023 SCC OnLine Del 6914
Judgment date20 September 2023
IP categoryOther
PartiesAnil Kapoor (Plaintiff) v. Simply Life India & Ors. (Defendants)

Relevant Acts and provisions

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Section Order XXXIX Rule 1Section Order XXXIX Rule 2

Provisions considered: Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in a suit asserting personality, publicity and copyright claims.

Brief facts

A well-known film actor sued numerous defendants for misusing his name, image, voice and signature catchphrase across the internet, including false endorsement as a motivational speaker, sale of merchandise bearing his likeness, artificial-intelligence generated deepfakes morphing his face onto other persons, animated images, ringtones, and squatted domain names incorporating his name.

Free to read once you are signed in

Read the rest of this case note

The findings, the decision and the principle the court settled on are below. Create a free account to keep reading. No payment, and nothing to cancel.

Already have an account? Sign in

Cases cited

  • R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1994) 6 SCC 632
  • Titan Industries Ltd. v. M/s Ramkumar Jewellers, 2012 SCC OnLine Del 2382

Authorities referred to in the decision. Please verify each citation in the judgment itself.

Keywords

AI And Deepfakes Domain Names Dynamic Injunction Personality Rights Publicity Rights

Read the judgment

View judgment (court website)