Case LawActs & SectionsIP IntelligenceOpen the app
IP Lex · Indian IP case law

Search Indian IP Case Law

Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.

Clear filters

5 results

for “Opposition”

Trade Marks

Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc v. Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.

Delhi High Court · C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 44/2025

Section 11(2) does not require a mark to have been formally declared well-known before its proprietor can invoke that status to oppose a similar or identical mark on dissimilar goods; it is enough that the mark is, in substance, e…

Bad Faith AdoptionCross-class ProtectionOppositionRemand
Trade Marks

Corn Products Refining Co. v. Shangrila Food Products Ltd.

Supreme Court of India · AIR 1960 SC 142

In opposition proceedings, the reputation of a trade mark for assessing likelihood of confusion attaches to the mark itself and not merely to the reputation of the proprietor; deceptive similarity may be found even between goods t…

Deceptive SimilarityGoods Of Same DescriptionOppositionReputation Of Mark
Patents

E.R. Squibb and Sons, LLC & Ors. v. Zydus Lifesciences Limited

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 376/2024

In a quia timet action under Sections 48 and 108, a strong prima facie apprehension of imminent infringement, evidenced by the defendant's own regulatory and manufacturing conduct, can justify an interim injunction; and a biosimil…

BiotechnologyInterim InjunctionPatent InfringementPharmaceutical Patent
Trade Marks

Industria De Diseno Textil, S.A. v. Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.

Delhi High Court · C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 52/2024, I.A. 33885/2024

Section 11(2) does not require an earlier mark to have a formal declaration of well-known status before its owner can oppose a later mark; the provision only requires that the mark is well known. The term 'entitled' in Explanation…

Anti-Dissection RuleBad FaithDeceptive SimilarityPhonetic Similarity
Trade Marks

Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.

Delhi High Court · LPA 316/2026 & CM APPL. 27819-20/2026

Where two parties file competing applications for registration of an identical or deceptively similar trade mark on a proposed-to-be-used basis, priority for registration under Section 18 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is determined…

Approbation and ReprobationPrior RegistrationPriorityProposed to be Used