Search Indian IP Case Law
Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.
3 results
for “Essential Features”
Reliance Industries Limited v. Pawan Kumar Gupta & Ors.
In assessing the likelihood of confusion for interim relief, courts must apply a more stringent standard where the infringing goods are edible products sold through online marketplaces to unsophisticated consumers, since even mino…
Dynamic InjunctionOnline InfringementPassing OffTrade DressTrade MarksS.M. Dyechem Ltd. v. Cadbury (India) Ltd.
Not good law on the test of deceptive similarity: see Cadila Health Care v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals (2001). Retained for its historical significance and its discussion of interim relief.
Deceptive SimilarityEssential FeaturesInterim InjunctionPICNICDesignsWhirlpool of India Ltd. v. Videocon Industries Ltd.
In an action for design piracy under the Designs Act, 2000, infringement is tested by comparing the overall visual impression of the two articles judged solely by the eye; a defendant's own subsequent design registration for a sim…
Deceptive SimilarityDesign InfringementDesign PiracyPassing Off