Search Indian IP Case Law
Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.
24 results
for “Deceptive Similarity”
TV Today Network v. Saurashtra Aaj Tak & Anr.
In a passing-off action the focus is on protecting the goodwill of the earlier user from a later use that is likely to create confusion or an impression of association. Actual confusion or loss need not always be proved; likelihoo…
AajTakDeceptive SimilarityDisclaimerGoodwillTrade MarksUnder Armour, Inc. v. Aditya Birla Fashion & Retail Ltd.
Although composite marks must be compared in their entirety under the anti-dissection rule, a mark may contain a dominant element that contributes disproportionately to its overall commercial impression, and such a dominant elemen…
Anti-Dissection RuleComposite MarksDeceptive SimilarityDominant MarkDesignsWhirlpool of India Ltd. v. Videocon Industries Ltd.
In an action for design piracy under the Designs Act, 2000, infringement is tested by comparing the overall visual impression of the two articles judged solely by the eye; a defendant's own subsequent design registration for a sim…
Deceptive SimilarityDesign InfringementDesign PiracyPassing OffTrade MarksYahoo!, Inc. v. Akash Arora & Anr.
A domain name is capable of functioning as a trade mark and business identifier, and its use by another in a manner deceptively similar to a prior user's trade mark or domain name, likely to confuse an average internet user, is ac…
CybersquattingDeceptive SimilarityDomain NamesOnline Infringement