Sign inOpen the app
IP Lex · Indian IP case law

Search Indian IP Case Law

Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.

Clear filters

50 results

for “SUPREME”

Patents

Dr. Aloys Wobben & Anr. v. Yogesh Mehra & Ors.

Supreme Court of India · (2014) 15 SCC 360

Section 64(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 grants alternative, not cumulative, remedies for seeking revocation of a patent: a petition before the Appellate Board, or a counter-claim in an infringement suit. Once a person interested el…

Counter-claimElection of RemediesPatent LitigationPatent Revocation
Copyright

Eastern Book Company & Ors. v. D.B. Modak & Anr.

Supreme Court of India · (2008) 1 SCC 1

Copyright in a derivative or compiled work requires the exercise of some minimum degree of creativity through the application of skill and judgment, and not merely labour and capital expended in copying. Inputs that involve only m…

Copyright InfringementLiterary WorkOriginalityPublic Domain
Copyright

Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Supreme Court of India

A licence to use a copy of software, or to resell it, without transferring any of the rights in Section 14 of the Copyright Act, does not amount to the use of or right to use copyright; payments for it are not royalty under the DT…

Copyrighted ArticleDistribution AgreementsEnd-user Licence AgreementRoyalty
Copyright

Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. v. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

Supreme Court of India · (2008) 13 SCC 30

An offer to license copyrighted broadcasting rights on unreasonable terms constitutes a refusal under Section 31(1)(b) of the Copyright Act, 1957, and the existence of one voluntary licence does not bar the Copyright Board from gr…

Broadcasting RightsCompulsory LicenceCopyright BoardMusic And Sound Recordings
Trade Marks

Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. v. Girnar Food & Beverages (P) Ltd.

Supreme Court of India · (2004) 5 SCC 257

A trade mark that is otherwise descriptive or laudatory of the goods is not, for that reason alone, incapable of protection in a passing off action; if the mark has, through long and extensive use, acquired a secondary meaning ide…

Descriptive MarksDistinctivenessGeneric MarksPassing Off
Copyright

Gramophone Company of India Ltd. v. Birendra Bahadur Pandey & Ors.

Supreme Court of India · AIR 1984 SC 667

Infringing copies brought into India, even for transit to another country, are 'imported' within Section 53 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and may be prohibited after an enquiry.

Customs SeizureGoods in TransitImportInfringing Copies
Trade Marks

Hardie Trading Ltd. & Anr. v. Addisons Paint and Chemicals Ltd.

Supreme Court of India · (2003) 11 SCC 92

In a non-use rectification under Section 46 of the 1958 Act, the applicant bears the burden of proving the statutory non-use conditions, while the proprietor must prove special circumstances excusing non-use; while a registration …

Honest Concurrent UseNon-usePerson AggrievedRectification
Trade Marks

Heinz Italia & Anr. v. Dabur India Ltd.

Supreme Court of India · (2007) 6 SCC 1

Where a prior user's mark and get-up are closely imitated by a later entrant in the same market, the prior user is entitled to interim protection against passing off.

Ad-interim InjunctionDeceptive SimilarityPassing OffPrior User
Copyright

Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Eastern India Motion Pictures Association & Ors.

Supreme Court of India · AIR 1977 SC 1443

Where music or lyrics are composed for a cinematograph film by an engaged composer or lyricist for valuable consideration, the film producer becomes the first owner of copyright in that contribution under Section 17 and thereby ac…

Assignment And LicensingCinematograph FilmCopyright SocietyFirst Ownership
Copyright

Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Sanjay Dalia & Anr.

Supreme Court of India · AIR 2015 SC 3479

Under Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act and Section 134(2) of the Trade Marks Act, a plaintiff that carries on business where the cause of action arose must sue at that place, and cannot invoke its principal office elsewhere to c…

Cause of ActionForum ShoppingPlace of BusinessTerritorial Jurisdiction
PreviousPage 2 of 5Next