Sign inOpen the app
IP Lex · Indian IP case law

Search Indian IP Case Law

Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.

Clear filters

106 results

for “Appeal”

Trade Marks

Uniply Industries Ltd. v. Unicorn Plywood Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Supreme Court of India · (2001) 5 SCC 95

Where priority of use rests on disputed evidence such as small sales volumes, and questions of honest concurrent use arise, an interim injunction requires a strong prima facie case; failing that, courts may decline injunctions to …

Interim InjunctionPassing OffPlywoodPrior Use
Patents

Viacyte Inc v. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs

Calcutta High Court

A claim that mixes product and process features without defining the structural features of the claimed device, and whose asserted inventive element is only a routinely adjusted process parameter, fails the clarity and sufficiency…

BioreactorClaim DefinitenessMixed-category ClaimsPatent Prosecution
Patents

Vifor (International) Ltd. & Anr. v. MSN Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi High Court

A product-by-process claim protects the novel product itself where the product cannot otherwise be defined by its structural features, and obtainable by language in such a claim is descriptive rather than limiting; infringement is…

Claim ConstructionInterim InjunctionNoveltyPharmaceutical Patent
Patents

Vishal Choudhary v. SNPC Machines Private Limited & Ors.

Delhi High Court

An interim injunction protecting patented machinery will not be lifted in appeal absent a demonstrated error in the trial court's prima facie assessment.

Appeal DismissedBrick-making MachinesInterim InjunctionPatent Infringement
Trade Marks

Wander Ltd. & Anr. v. Antox India P. Ltd.

Supreme Court of India · 1990 Supp SCC 727

An appellate court will not interfere with a trial court's discretionary order on an interlocutory injunction unless the discretion was exercised arbitrarily, capriciously or perversely, or contrary to settled principles.

Appellate InterferenceDiscretionInterim InjunctionPassing Off
Patents

Zydus Lifesciences Limited v. E.R. Squibb and Sons, LLC & Ors.

Delhi High Court

In interlocutory patent proceedings concerning a life-saving drug, public interest is a pre-eminent consideration. Where infringement or validity turns on complex technical issues that need trial, the patentee should ordinarily be…

BiosimilarInterim InjunctionLife-saving DrugsPatent Infringement
PreviousPage 11 of 11