IP Intelligence › What Changed › Reporting your foreign filings got much simpler
What changed · 15 March 2024
Reporting your foreign filings got much simpler
What changed
Rule 12 was amended. The statement and undertaking under section 8(1) is filed within six months of filing in India. The duty to keep the Controller informed under section 8(1)(b) is now discharged within three months of the first statement of objections, replacing the old rolling six-month obligation on each new foreign filing. The Controller may now use accessible databases to obtain the information, and new rule 12(5) allows delay in filing Form 3 to be condoned by up to three months on a Form 4 request.
Why it matters
Section 8 non-compliance is a ground of revocation under section 64(1)(m). The old rolling duty was easy to breach across a large family handled by several firms. Form 3 is now effectively filed twice, which is far easier to manage - and there is, for the first time, an express power to condone delay.
Who should care
Anyone with an Indian application that has foreign family members.
What you should do
Run a family audit at the examination report stage and file a consolidated Form 3 that is accurate as at that date. Give one person in India ownership of foreign filing particulars for the whole family.
Sources & further reading
- The Patents Rules, 2003, as amended (e-version updated to 15 March 2024) — Official IP India text
- The Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2024 - G.S.R. 211(E), 15 March 2024 — Gazette text via WIPO Lex
Related
Section 8 particulars
The duty to tell the Indian Patent Office about corresponding applications you have filed outside India for the same or substantially the same invention, and to keep…
The form that can revoke a patent
Section 8 requires you to tell the Indian Patent Office about corresponding applications filed abroad. It is administrative, it is easy to overlook in a large family…
The case that made Section 8 revocation discretionary
Not sure whether this applies to your invention?
The honest answer usually needs someone to look at your actual disclosure, your timeline and the prior art. That is a conversation, not an article.
Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.
Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.
