IP IntelligenceIP Lex ›Book a service

IP IntelligenceWhat ChangedWorking statements moved from yearly to once every three fin

What changed · 15 March 2024, first deadline 30 September 2026

Working statements moved from yearly to once every three financial years - and the first deadline is close

CriticalIntermediateFounderIP professionalEnterprise

What changed

Rule 131(2) was substituted by the Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2024. The statement of working on Form 27 is now furnished once in respect of every period of three financial years, starting from the financial year commencing immediately after the year of grant, and within six months of the end of each such period. Form 27 itself was simplified, and a three-month extension is available on Form 4.

Why it matters

An annual task gets built into a calendar. A triennial one falls out of it - and because the change reduced the burden, it was widely reported as good news and then forgotten. Meanwhile the enforcement route around it got sharper: the Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2025 introduced Chapter XIV-A with an electronic complaint on Form 32 and an appeal on Form 33, and the Jan Vishwas Act, 2023 replaced imprisonment with monetary penalties for section 122 offences with effect from 1 August 2024.

Who should care

Every patentee and every licensee of an Indian patent, exclusive or otherwise.

What you should do

Map each granted patent to its financial year of grant, and from that to its three-year block. For patents granted on or before 31 March 2023, the first statement under the new regime is due by 30 September 2026. Record working information as it arises rather than reconstructing three years of it in September.

Verify before you rely on this

The mapping of grant dates to blocks follows IP India's Form 27 FAQs dated 26 August 2024. That document is no longer available on the IP India portal - the link now returns 404 - so it survives only through firm commentary. Confirm the block that applies to your patents with your agent before filing.

Related

Not sure whether this applies to your invention?

The honest answer usually needs someone to look at your actual disclosure, your timeline and the prior art. That is a conversation, not an article.

Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.

Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.