IP IntelligenceIP Lex ›Book a service

IP Intelligence

Patent Myths

Widely repeated beliefs about patents, and what the position actually is.

Showing 3 of 51.

Myth

“A broad title makes a broad patent.”

Reality

The title identifies the application for classification and searching. It has no effect on scope, and no infringement was ever decided on it.

Myth

“You need a working prototype to file a patent.”

Reality

India does not require a prototype or a deposit. It requires a description sufficient for a skilled person to perform the invention.

Myth

“The examiner decides whether I get a patent.”

Reality

The examiner searches and reports. The Controller decides - issues the report, holds the hearing, and grants or refuses.

Keep going.

Every explanation here links to the ones next to it. Follow the thread rather than the menu.

Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.