IP Intelligence › In Simple Words › Prosecution history
In simple words
Prosecution history
Also called: File wrapper
Everything you argued to get the patent granted is public, permanent, and available to the person you later sue.
- In simple words
- The complete record of correspondence between the applicant and the Patent Office - objections, replies, amendments and arguments - which anyone can inspect after publication.
- Think of it as
- A transcript of every concession you made.
- Why it matters
- If you told the examiner your invention was distinguished from the prior art because it required feature X, it is difficult to argue later that a competitor without feature X infringes. What you say to get past an objection narrows what you can assert.
- A simple example
- To overcome an obviousness objection you argue that the essential difference is a two-stage filter. A competitor uses a single-stage filter. Your own file makes their non-infringement argument for them.
- Common mistake
- Writing FER replies as though nobody will ever read them again. They are the first thing an opponent's counsel reads.
Sources & further reading
- The Patents Act, 1970 (consolidated to 1 August 2024) — Official IP India text
Related
Claim construction
The process of deciding what the words of a claim mean, read purposively, through the eyes of the person skilled in the art, in the light of the specification and dr…
First Examination Report
The Patent Office's first written list of objections to your application, together with the prior art relied on. You have six months from its issue to put the applic…
What you said to the examiner is a public document
Every argument, amendment and concession made to get a patent granted sits on a public file that anyone can inspect. It is the first thing an opponent's counsel read…
Keep going.
Every explanation here links to the ones next to it. Follow the thread rather than the menu.
Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.
Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.
