IP IntelligenceIP Lex ›Book a service

IP IntelligenceIn Simple WordsForeign filing permission

In simple words

Foreign filing permission

Also called: Section 39, Foreign filing licence, Form 25

CriticalAdvancedFounderIP professionalResearcher

An Indian resident who files abroad first, without permission, can lose the Indian patent entirely - and commit an offence. It is one of the least-known provisions in the Act.

In simple words
A person resident in India may not apply outside India for a patent for an invention without written permission from the Controller, unless an application for the same invention was filed in India at least six weeks earlier and no secrecy direction has been imposed.
Think of it as
File in India first, or ask permission before filing anywhere else.
Why it matters
It bites most often on Indian researchers with foreign co-inventors, and on Indian employees of multinationals whose group files in the United States as a matter of course. The consequences include refusal or revocation of the Indian patent under section 40. Criminal exposure was narrowed by the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026, in force for patent provisions from 1 June 2026, which removed criminal punishment for section 39 breaches where the Central Government forms the opinion that the invention was not relevant to defence or atomic energy - but the requirement itself, and the refusal and revocation risk, remain.
A simple example
An Indian-resident inventor working with a US company lets the company file in the USPTO first. Unless permission was obtained or an Indian application preceded it by six weeks, the Indian position is compromised.
Common mistake
Assuming this only applies to defence or atomic energy inventions. It applies generally to residents of India.

Related

Keep going.

Every explanation here links to the ones next to it. Follow the thread rather than the menu.

Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.

Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.