IP Intelligence › In Simple Words › Divisional application
In simple words
Divisional application
Also called: Further application under section 16
A divisional lets you carve a second patent out of an application you have already filed - but only while the first one is still pending.
- In simple words
- A further application under section 16, filed in respect of an invention disclosed in the provisional or complete specification already filed, which may be filed at any time before the grant of the parent.
- Think of it as
- Splitting one application into two, keeping the original date.
- Why it matters
- Two things changed recently and both matter. Rule 13(2A), inserted in 2024, expressly allows a further application to be filed in respect of an invention disclosed in an earlier further application - so a divisional of a divisional. And the Delhi High Court held in 2023 that the plurality of inventions justifying a divisional is tested on the disclosure in the provisional or complete specification, and need not appear in the parent's claims.
- A simple example
- Your specification describes a device and a method of manufacturing it, but you only claimed the device. A divisional directed to the method can be based on that disclosure - it does not fail merely because the method was never claimed in the parent.
- Common mistake
- Waiting for the grant letter before deciding. Once the parent is granted, the door is closed.
Sources & further reading
Related
Unity of invention
The requirement that a single application relate to one invention, or to a group of inventions linked so as to form a single inventive concept.
The case that reopened divisional applications
The divisional you could no longer file
A divisional application must be filed before the parent is granted. That is a moving target you do not control - and it is the single most common way that valuable …
Keep going.
Every explanation here links to the ones next to it. Follow the thread rather than the menu.
Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.
Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.
