IP IntelligenceIP Lex ›Book a service

IP IntelligenceFor YouLicensing your patent without giving it away

For founders

Licensing your patent without giving it away

How do we structure a licence?

IntermediateFounder
Short answer

Define the scope narrowly, decide who can enforce, and say what happens if the patent is narrowed or revoked. The rate is the easy part.

The clauses that decide the value

Scope - field of use and territory, defined by application rather than by industry label, and covering which of making, using, selling and importing are licensed.

Enforcement - who may sue an infringer, who pays, who controls settlement and who keeps recoveries. Without this an exclusive licensee may find they cannot act while the patentee has no incentive to.

Improvements - who owns what the licensee develops on top, and whether there is a licence back.

Validity - what happens to royalties if the patent is revoked or narrowed, and whether the licensee may challenge validity at all.

Recordal - licences should be recorded, and the agreement should say who is responsible.

Before you negotiate a rate

Value the patent honestly. If a licensee could design around claim 1 in a month, the rate is not the issue - the scope is. And remember that licensees have working statement obligations under section 146 too; put it in the agreement and remind them at each three-year block.

What to actually do

  • Draft the enforcement clause before the royalty clause.
  • Define field and territory by application, not by industry label.
  • Address revocation, narrowing and lapse separately.
  • Record the licence and say who is responsible for doing it.

Sources & further reading

Related

Not sure whether this applies to your invention?

The honest answer usually needs someone to look at your actual disclosure, your timeline and the prior art. That is a conversation, not an article.

Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.

Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.