IP IntelligenceIP Lex ›Book a service

IP IntelligenceFor YouIP risk in the supply chain

For enterprises

IP risk in the supply chain

We buy components. Whose problem is a patent on one of them?

IntermediateEnterprise
Short answer

Yours, usually. Selling a product that infringes is an infringing act regardless of who made the component, and standard supply terms rarely indemnify against it.

Where the exposure sits

Making, using, offering for sale, selling and importing are all infringing acts. If a bought-in component or process falls within someone's claims, your product infringes when you sell it - whoever manufactured the part.

Supplier terms typically warrant against defects, not against patent infringement. An IP indemnity has to be negotiated, and it is far easier to obtain before volume commitments than after a letter arrives.

What to do about it

Scope freedom to operate studies to the whole product, including bought-in elements. List them explicitly and confirm they were in scope.

Negotiate IP indemnities with the suppliers of the components that carry real risk - not all of them, just the ones where a third-party right would stop your product.

And re-run the check when a supplier changes. A component substitution made for cost or availability reasons can move you inside somebody's claims without anyone in the business realising a legal question has arisen.

What to actually do

  • You infringe by selling, whoever made the component.
  • Read the supplier warranty - defects and IP are different clauses.
  • Scope FTO to the whole product, listing bought-in elements.
  • Re-run the check whenever a supplier or component changes.

Sources & further reading

Related

Getting ready to launch?

A patent of your own says nothing about whether you are free to sell. Those are two different questions and they need two different searches.

Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.

Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.