IP IntelligenceIP Lex ›Book a service

IP Intelligence

Patent Criticalities

The things that quietly decide whether an invention can be protected - explained before they cost you anything.

Showing 13 of 56.

Critical

Nobody asked the Patent Office to look at it

An Indian patent application is not examined unless someone files a request and pays for it. If the request is not filed in time, the application is treated as withd…

During examinationIntermediate
Critical

The reply that quietly gave the patent away

A first examination report is an opening position, not a rejection. The two ways applicants lose value here are missing the date, and buying a grant by conceding mor…

During examinationIntermediate
High

New is the easy part. Inventive is the hard part.

Novelty is a single-document test and it is largely mechanical. Inventive step is a judgement about whether a competent, unimaginative person in your field would hav…

During examinationIntermediate
Critical

The thirty-one months that ended the case

If a PCT application does not enter the Indian national phase within thirty-one months of the priority date, it is treated as withdrawn so far as India is concerned.…

During examinationAdvanced
Critical

Most applications do not fail. They stop.

Very few Indian applications are refused after an argument. Most simply end because a date passed - and because there is no decision to appeal, there is often nothin…

During examinationBeginner
High

Somebody is reading your published application

Publication makes your application visible to everyone who competes with you. In some industries, opposition is a routine part of the landscape rather than an except…

During examinationAdvanced
High

What you said to the examiner is a public document

Every argument, amendment and concession made to get a patent granted sits on a public file that anyone can inspect. It is the first thing an opponent's counsel read…

During examinationAdvanced
Medium

Why clarity objections arrive

Clarity objections look minor and are often answered carelessly, by adding limitations to make the point go away. That is the expensive route. A clarity objection is…

During examinationIntermediate
Medium

Why unity objections arise

A unity objection is not an attack on your invention. It is the examiner saying that one application cannot cover all of this - and it creates a decision with a dead…

During examinationIntermediate
High

The divisional you could no longer file

A divisional application must be filed before the parent is granted. That is a moving target you do not control - and it is the single most common way that valuable …

During examinationAdvanced
High

The patent that only covers what you already sell

There is a version of every application that will be granted: the one narrowed to precisely what you already sell. It is also the version competitors do not need to …

During examinationIntermediate
Medium

Everything is obvious once you know the answer

Once you have read the invention, the route to it looks inevitable. Combination objections often rely on that effect - so the reply has to force the analysis back to…

During examinationAdvanced
High

The form that can revoke a patent

Section 8 requires you to tell the Indian Patent Office about corresponding applications filed abroad. It is administrative, it is easy to overlook in a large family…

During examinationAdvanced

LowWorth knowing
MediumCould create complications
HighCan materially affect protection
CriticalAct before proceeding

This is the Ragulika IP Educational Criticality - our own editorial prioritisation device, to help you decide what to read first. It is not a legal score, it is not calculated from your facts, and it says nothing about the strength of any particular application.

Keep going.

Every explanation here links to the ones next to it. Follow the thread rather than the menu.

Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.