Before a hearing with the Controller

Run this the week the hearing notice arrives.

HighDuring examinationFounderIP professional

A hearing is the last chance to change the outcome before a decision is written. The Controller has already read the file.

Tick anything that is true. Each tick opens a short note on why it matters. Nothing you tick is sent anywhere - it stays in this browser tab.

Do you have a one-page claim chart against the closest cited document?The single technical difference, with a page and line reference, is what the hearing turns on.
If yes: If it takes a paragraph to state the difference, it is not ready.
Do you have a marked-up fallback claim set?Without one, the Controller has only two options: allow the claim as it stands, or refuse.
If yes: Bring an amendment the Controller could allow on the day, supported by the specification.
Are you planning to argue commercial success or foreign grants?Indian subject-matter and inventive-step law differ, so a foreign grant proves little.
If yes: Lead with the technical difference and its effect. Keep the rest as secondary support at most.
Have all formal objections been cleared?A surviving formal objection can end the application regardless of the substantive argument.
If yes: Clear them before the hearing so the discussion is about substance.
Do you know the deadline for written submissions after the hearing?Post-hearing submissions consolidate the argument, but they have their own date.
If yes: Diarise it at the hearing itself.
If the application has become commercially unimportant, have you decided that deliberately?Letting a hearing lapse ends the application by default rather than by decision.
If yes: Withdraw it deliberately, or attend. Do not let it drift.
Have you considered a divisional before the parent is decided?Grant closes the divisional window, and so, in a different way, does refusal.
If yes: Decide now whether unclaimed disclosed subject matter is worth preserving.

Never walk into a hearing with only one acceptable outcome.

Sources & further reading

The Patents Act, 1970 (consolidated to 1 August 2024) — Official IP India text
The Patents Rules, 2003, as amended (e-version updated to 15 March 2024) — Official IP India text

HighCriticality

Turning up to the hearing with nothing new

A hearing is the last chance to change the outcome before a decision is written. The Controller has already read the file, so repeating the written arguments achieve…

During examinationIntermediate

HighScenario

The hearing with no fallback

What would have changed the outcome?

During examinationBeginner

In simple words

Hearing

An oral proceeding before the Controller in which the applicant (usually through a patent agent) argues the outstanding objections, normally followed by written subm…

Intermediate

Holding an examination report?

A reply is an argument, not a form. What you concede now shapes what your patent is worth later.

Get help with your FER Read the journey

Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.

Last reviewed by Ragulika IP on 2026-08-23. Indian patent law and Patent Office practice change; check the position before you rely on it.