IP Intelligence
Case in 90 Seconds
Indian decisions that changed how patents are read, written and defended - each one in ninety seconds.
Showing 17 of 17.
The case that defined what "efficacy" means
The case that reopened divisional applications
The case that confirmed India bars business methods absolutely
The case that put technical effect back at the centre
The case that still defines inventive step in India
The case that closed the door on late national phase entry
India’s first full standard-essential patent trial
India’s first compulsory licence, upheld
The genus, the species, and the argument you cannot run both ways
The case that made Section 8 revocation discretionary
You have to choose how you attack a patent
The case that rescued software patents in India
Infringement found, injunction refused
Bioavailability is still not efficacy
How Indian courts read a claim
Replacing bamboo with plastic is not an invention
A product-by-process claim is a product claim
Keep going.
Every explanation here links to the ones next to it. Follow the thread rather than the menu.
Educational guidance, not legal advice. This material is published by Ragulika IP for general education and information. It is not legal advice, it does not create a professional-client relationship, and it is not a substitute for advice on your own facts. Patentability, infringement, prosecution strategy and every other IP outcome turn on the specific facts and on the law and Patent Office practice as they stand at the time you act. Please take professional advice before making a decision, and read the underlying provision or judgment before relying on any point stated here.