Case LawActs & SectionsOpen the app
IP Intelligence

Search Indian IP Case Law

Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.

Clear filters

5 results

for “Remand”

Trade Marks

ADS Spirits Pvt. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks

Delhi High Court · C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 8/2026 and I.A. 3697/2026

Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 proscribes registration only where a mark is devoid of distinctive character, that is, incapable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of another; it does not…

Absolute Grounds for RefusalArbitrary MarkDistinctivenessNon-speaking Order
Patents

Array Biopharma Inc v. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs

Delhi High Court · C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 37/2023

A combination of distinct and independent active drugs, each with its own chemical identity and mechanism, does not fall under the Section 3(d) bar for derivatives of known substances. Using phrases such as 'for simultaneous, sepa…

Inventive StepMethod of TreatmentPharmaceutical CombinationPrior Art
Trade Marks

Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc v. Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.

Delhi High Court · C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 44/2025

Section 11(2) does not require a mark to have been formally declared well-known before its proprietor can invoke that status to oppose a similar or identical mark on dissimilar goods; it is enough that the mark is, in substance, e…

Bad Faith AdoptionCross-class ProtectionOppositionRemand
Patents

Deepak Nitrite Limited v. The Assistant Controller General of Patents and Designs

Bombay High Court · Commercial Miscellaneous Petition No. 107 of 2025

It is wholly impermissible for the Controller, while exercising quasi-judicial powers under Section 15, to rely upon 'common general knowledge' as a self-sufficient ground for refusing a patent application without setting out and …

Common General KnowledgeFood Grade Sodium NitriteFree-FlowingImpurity Profile
Patents

T-Mobile International AG and Co. KG. v. The Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks and Anr.

Delhi High Court · C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 149/2022

Section 3(m) contains four disjunctive exceptions: a mere scheme, rule, or method of performing a mental act, and a method of playing a game. The word 'mere' qualifies the first three limbs, confining the exclusion to claims that …

Computer Implemented InventionGuidelinesMental ActMethod of Playing Game