Case LawActs & SectionsOpen the app
IP Intelligence

Search Indian IP Case Law

Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.

Clear filters

8 results

for “Interim Injunction”

Copyright

ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

Delhi High Court · I.A. 45300/2024 in CS(COMM) 1028/2024, I.A. 45301/2024 & I.A. 26192/2025

An Indian court has jurisdiction if the plaintiff's principal place of business is in India, or if the defendant targets Indian users, even when the defendant's servers are located abroad. Even temporarily storing a copyrighted wo…

Artificial IntelligenceCopyright Fair DealingCopyright InfringementJurisdiction
Designs

Crocs Inc USA v. M/s Bata India Ltd and Ors.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 625/2018

In commercial litigation, costs ordinarily follow the outcome of the case, and the successful party is awarded actual and reasonable litigation expenses. Parties pursuing commercial disputes must bear the financial consequences of…

Actual CostsCancellation of DesignDesign InfringementIndustrial Design
Trade Marks

Havells India Limited & Anr. v. Havai Home Products Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 778/2024 (with I.A. 38970/2024)

Even a registered proprietor may be restrained from using a trade mark where the ingredients of passing off are established. Section 27(2) preserves the common-law remedy of passing off notwithstanding the statutory rights arising…

Anti-Dissection RuleDeceptive SimilarityDishonest AdoptionPassing Off
Trade Marks

New Balance Athletics Inc. v. Astormueller AG and Ors.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 962/2025

Registration of a mark is no defence to a passing off action, since rights under Section 27(2) are independent of and override the bar in Section 28(3) on one registered proprietor suing another for infringement. Registration mere…

Anti-Dissection RuleDeceptive SimilarityInitial Interest ConfusionPassing Off
Copyright

Opella Healthcare Group v. Pureca Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Copyright)

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 552/2024 & I.A. 32616/2024 (arising from I.A. 4622/2025)

A defendant cannot defend a copyright infringement suit on the basis of a registration that has been cancelled by an unchallenged rectification order which found the artistic work to be a copy of the plaintiff's pre-existing get-u…

Artistic WorkColourable ImitationCopyright RectificationLabel Design
Trade Marks

Opella Healthcare Group v. Pureca Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Trade Marks)

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 552/2024 & I.A. 32616/2024 (arising out of I.A. 4622/2025)

Where a coordinate bench, following an unchallenged rectification order, has found the mark in question deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered mark, the defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the infri…

Deceptive SimilarityPassing OffPharmaceutical MarksPrior Use
Copyright

Saregama India Ltd. v. Black Madras Films & Ors.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 1310/2025 & CS(COMM) 143/2026

Copyright in a musical composition is distinct from copyright in the sound recording and cinematograph film in which the composition is incorporated. The composer, as author of the musical work, retains copyright in the musical co…

Assignment of RightsCinematograph FilmComposerLiterary and Musical Works
Trade Marks

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. Finecure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Ors.

Delhi High Court · FAO(OS) (COMM) 200/2023, CM APPL. 47338-47340/2023

Mere delay in approaching the Court is not, by itself, sufficient to refuse an injunction, particularly in the pharmaceutical field where confusion between similar marks may also affect public interest.

Deceptive SimilarityDelayInterim InjunctionPANTOCID