Case LawActs & SectionsOpen the app
IP Intelligence

Search Indian IP Case Law

Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.

Clear filters

5 results

for “Delay”

Trade Marks

Arun Kumar Gupta v. Registrar of Trade Marks

Delhi High Court · W.P.(C)-IPD 28/2026 and C.M. Nos. 175-176/2026

Issuance of notice in Form O-3 under Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is a mandatory pre-condition for removal of a trade mark from the Register on account of non-renewal. Mere expiry of registration or failure to file a…

Form O-3Mandatory NoticeRegistered ProprietorRemoval of Trademark
Patents

Deepak Nitrite Limited v. The Assistant Controller General of Patents and Designs

Bombay High Court · Commercial Miscellaneous Petition No. 107 of 2025

It is wholly impermissible for the Controller, while exercising quasi-judicial powers under Section 15, to rely upon 'common general knowledge' as a self-sufficient ground for refusing a patent application without setting out and …

Common General KnowledgeFood Grade Sodium NitriteFree-FlowingImpurity Profile
Copyright

Opella Healthcare Group v. Pureca Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Copyright)

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 552/2024 & I.A. 32616/2024 (arising from I.A. 4622/2025)

A defendant cannot defend a copyright infringement suit on the basis of a registration that has been cancelled by an unchallenged rectification order which found the artistic work to be a copy of the plaintiff's pre-existing get-u…

Artistic WorkColourable ImitationCopyright RectificationLabel Design
Trade Marks

Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.

Delhi High Court · LPA 316/2026 & CM APPL. 27819-20/2026

Where two parties file competing applications for registration of an identical or deceptively similar trade mark on a proposed-to-be-used basis, priority for registration under Section 18 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is determined…

Approbation and ReprobationPrior RegistrationPriorityProposed to be Used
Trade Marks

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. Finecure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Ors.

Delhi High Court · FAO(OS) (COMM) 200/2023, CM APPL. 47338-47340/2023

Mere delay in approaching the Court is not, by itself, sufficient to refuse an injunction, particularly in the pharmaceutical field where confusion between similar marks may also affect public interest.

Deceptive SimilarityDelayInterim InjunctionPANTOCID