Case LawActs & SectionsOpen the app
IP Intelligence

Search Indian IP Case Law

Judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts on patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications — organised by Act and section, each with a link to the judgment on the court’s website.

Clear filters

5 results

· Section 29 · trade-marks-act-1999

Trade Marks

Ashiana Ispat Limited v. Kamdhenu Limited & Ors.

Delhi High Court · FAO(OS) (COMM) 120/2026 with CM APPL. 27051/2026

A mere contractual promise to let someone adopt and use a mark is not the same as transferring ownership, where the contract makes ownership conditional on registration. Non-use of a mark for decades defeats a claim to common-law …

AssignmentDiscretionary OrderInterlocutory InjunctionLicence
Copyright

Dr. Ashok M. Bhat v. Harichand Nagpal & Ors.

Bombay High Court · IA (L) No. 9324 of 2025 with NOM No. 1269 of 2016 in Commercial IP Suit No. 378 of 2021

An injunction against use of a registered artistic work follows the artistic work onto any label, not merely the one impugned in the plaint. In Order XXXIX Rule 2A proceedings justification is no defence: so long as an order stand…

Contempt of InjunctionCounterfeitingExemplary CostsOrder XXXIX Rule 2A
Trade Marks

Havells India Limited & Anr. v. Havai Home Products Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 778/2024 (with I.A. 38970/2024)

Even a registered proprietor may be restrained from using a trade mark where the ingredients of passing off are established. Section 27(2) preserves the common-law remedy of passing off notwithstanding the statutory rights arising…

Anti-Dissection RuleDeceptive SimilarityDishonest AdoptionPassing Off
Trade Marks

New Balance Athletics Inc. v. Astormueller AG and Ors.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 962/2025

Registration of a mark is no defence to a passing off action, since rights under Section 27(2) are independent of and override the bar in Section 28(3) on one registered proprietor suing another for infringement. Registration mere…

Anti-Dissection RuleDeceptive SimilarityInitial Interest ConfusionPassing Off
Trade Marks

Opella Healthcare Group v. Pureca Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Trade Marks)

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 552/2024 & I.A. 32616/2024 (arising out of I.A. 4622/2025)

Where a coordinate bench, following an unchallenged rectification order, has found the mark in question deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered mark, the defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the infri…

Deceptive SimilarityPassing OffPharmaceutical MarksPrior Use